21 Comments
User's avatar
CA's avatar

So many problems with our voting system. Here’s just one: I lived in a large apartment house in LA. There was one central rack of mailboxes in a hallway off the lobby. The postman would throw any undeliverable mail in a large tray underneath. It was always full of mail-in ballots at election time. Any dishonest person could pick up an armload and mail them in. Mail in voting is fraught with fraud opportunities.

Brian MacIsaac's avatar

You laid it out very well Lou. Yes the bill needs to be more comprehensive and more work is definitely needed to tighten things up and to make sure that votes are counted ON election day. Not three and four weeks later (as they’re needed by the Democrats). It’s gonna take a lot more than prop 39 to restore my faith in anything that has to do with California elections.

LT's avatar
2hEdited

California has intentionally and deliberately set up voting laws to keep the Democratic Party in undisputed power. This strategy, along with prohibition of investigative journalism (Nick Shirley Act) which is critical of Democratic politics, is no accident and all by design in order to quash any and all opposition. NGO’s + Public Sector Unions + Environmental Radicalism + Rainbow Activism = Political Dominance. All codified by California State Law.

In fact, California has become so dysfunctional, that where else can a state employee and UCSB Professor call for the violent overthrow of the government with NO apparent consequences?

https://www.independentsentinel.com/university-of-california-professor-preps-for-violent-revolution/

Jeff barton's avatar

I have read reports that Spencer Pratt was the victim of vote harvesting from homeless in downtown Los Angeles. Legal vote harvesting is legal cheating and the harvesters get paid for this. According to reports, harvestes (is that a word?) were also paid or bribed with a pack of Kool cigarettes.

Someone Is Collecting Homeless Ballots in Downtown Los Angeles at an Industrial Scale. All of Them Are Marked for Nithiya Raman.

https://www.smobserved.com/story/2026/06/08/news/someone-is-collecting-homeless-ballots-in-downtown-los-angeles-at-an-industrial-scale-all-of-them-are-marked-for-nithiya-raman/9909.html

Steve Johnson's avatar

The most important word in this article is "disingenuous".

D Michels's avatar

It is such a simple way to make our voting accurate, how can the Democrats justify not showing ID. Oh, I know, they can only win while cheating.

Cricket's avatar

Just an idea that a few would appreciate, but most would push back on.....

To maximize election security and prevent voter fraud, I propose updating the voting system with the following measures:

Secure Identification: Attach a thumbprint to your driver's license to verify your identity.

Controlled Location: Cast votes at the police department—overseen by law enforcement rather than City Hall with volunteers—to maintain a secure environment.

Instant Verification: Automatically send an email and text confirmation detailing who you voted for.

Ginger Lordus's avatar

Well, this is a conundrum. If the perpetually rigged california elections have NOT been fixed ie illegals voting, democrat antics (ballot stuffing, harvesting, pay to play, shredding, dumping, hiding, copying etc) then how will this voter ID proposition pass? The recent primary rigged election has already resulted in some "selected" candidates nationwide. I vote to pause the midterm election until we have a safe and secure system. If you dont know what this takes, then research it.

H Scott Dempster's avatar

Hey Ginger, it's like I commented before in this thread: The research is in. We have been doing mail-in ballots since 1962.

When Trump lost against Biden the flood of "fraud!" came from several directions.

When Trump ran for his second term the Specter of fraud was everywhere. But disappeared when he won.

Can us Republicans lose an election and not lose our common sense?

Look what true Americans have done in the recent past: Al Gore ( the loser in a very tight election and the person in Congress to certify the election) did in 2000. Or to a lesser degree, not the loser, but more importantly not a Lackey) Mike Pence in 2021

H Scott Dempster's avatar

This is where it gets dangerous people; A quote from Ginger Lordus above:

" I vote to pause the midterm election until we have a safe and secure system. If you dont know what this takes, then research it".

And you will find fraud! Election boards have kept very close track of this for at least a half a century or more. Check out the numbers there... ( what was your Source Ginger?)

Recently some state election officials now fear there may be federal agents attempting to seize ballots " to combat" possible, potential, (use any word but "significant" or "consequential") "election fraud".

People, people, people. A return to Common Sense is long overdue for (far too many of) us here in the USA.

Arun Kumar's avatar

India has voting ID but you sometimes need time to get your name in the list of you've been living elsewhere. We don't have mail in ballot yet, but opens up opportunities or perception of abuse.

Chuck Bennett's avatar

The response by BH is a typical ridiculous Dem response. If you are so confident there is no election fraud, then why don't you agree to the simple fact that requiring Voter ID will not affect the elections? Its such an obvious fact voter integrity is necessary and an issue, but if these Dems state there is no fraud, then agree that it won;t matter if voter ID is required.!!!! Its just an insane response and makes no sense. We MUST have voter ID period!!! Its common snese, its not racist, and does not discourage anyone other than those who should not be voting. COMMON SENSE!!!

Celeste Barber's avatar

Until recently, I served as a poll worker. We were not permitted to ask for identification. But always, some voters would approach us with their driver's license already out. They'd get upset even when we told them to put the ID away. And I have to add, whenever a store clerk asks to see my ID, I will reply with a thank you.

Michael J. Flood's avatar

How about verifying California residency?!

BH's avatar

Where is the alleged “voter fraud” you claim there is, which this prop aims to eliminate? There has never been credible evidence, only unproven accusations. There are not armies of people filling out ballots for eligible voters like many in the Republican party love to claim. Voter rolls are kept and votes are tracked so there’s no duplicates in the system.

In fact, the bigger issue is encouraging everyone to vote and to voice their opinion through the ballot. “Election Integrity” is merely a veil to disincentivize people from voting. Discouraging people from voting sounds a lot like certain people have things to hide and fear losing power.

H Scott Dempster's avatar

"Will Proposition 39 cure all that ails us in California with respect to potential voter fraud and cheating?"

Look at this first sentence. How does something potential ale you? It doesn't. But it could... but it hasn't, since 1962.

Look at the 1st reply. It is summed up with the sentence, "Mail in voting is fraught with fraud opportunities".

Our president just used a mail-in ballot.

I am an old school (Republican) guy raised with Midwestern values. We have a saying, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

Lawrence Duffield's avatar

If it is broke, fix it immediately.

Roland Salvato's avatar

Sounds like a Trump supporter.

Jeff barton's avatar

Sounds like an election integrity supporter.