For what it is worth, exit polling indicates that democracy and corruption are among the top concerns of voters. Presumably this means that Trump is both a threat to democracy and corrupt. This is what the Democrat party has made a big part of their campaign strategy and what Democrat voters believe. I can't imagine anything more corrupt or antithetical to democratic process than partisan judges using their power to influence the outcome of an election. Of course facts do not matter to Democrat voters who are animated only by emotion.
Silly little comment. Activists judges are a serious threat to democracy issuing by fiat rulings to influence election outcomes. Neither Romney or Mauldin are conservative, speak for conservatives nor do conservatives give a shit what they have to say.
Agree re activist judges, but what are the measurements of which judicial actions make the biggest difference. I don't disagree with you, but want some well-researched detail. Such detail is hard to find.
Any other specific critiques of Romney or Mauldin, or really good alternatives are welcome. BTW, they are both conservatives - which does not mean you have to like them personally or agree with them 100%. They both are knowledgeable, and Mauldin especially does his homework. Please take a step back, and post some detail or some entire new critiques.
Some people on this thread think I am arrogant, but a better description of me is that I am demanding and impatient. I like different opinions, provided there is some effort behind them.
So what is the problem with a singular judge issuing a stay or desist order on the executive branch? Besides it being stupid calling into question the legitimacy of that judge education and ability to pass the bar; what's the problem...? Laugh
The Democrats have been beating the drum of concern about the Law of the land and the Constitution for over 30 years. So where now is the concern that Muslims are calling for the jailing of Conservatives, refuse to reject Sharia Law that means they are rejecting the Law of the Nation, and are in general waving the middle finger at the good old USA just before Veterans Day?
Talked with a vote party line Dem and asked why knowing this did he continue understanding this a full attack on the Constitution and English based general laws. His answer was and is not to answer and look at the ground.
There you go. If you are a Dem, and have repudiated the proven press conferences where the DSA stated a clear Communist line what does that make you?
Nothing new here folks move along the Dem's lawfare judges are continuing what they were doing 30 years ago... They are now openly stating they want the USA torn down.
For what it is worth, exit polling indicates that democracy and corruption are among the top concerns of voters. Presumably this means that Trump is both a threat to democracy and corrupt. This is what the Democrat party has made a big part of their campaign strategy and what Democrat voters believe. I can't imagine anything more corrupt or antithetical to democratic process than partisan judges using their power to influence the outcome of an election. Of course facts do not matter to Democrat voters who are animated only by emotion.
Grandma would say;
The *DSA is breeding a scab on the end of their nose.
*Democratic SOCIALISTS of America.
Sadly Destroy Safe America rings closer to the truth.
Silly little gripes. Read Romneys Nov 4 critique or John Mauldins newsletter yesterday, and get real
Silly little comment. Activists judges are a serious threat to democracy issuing by fiat rulings to influence election outcomes. Neither Romney or Mauldin are conservative, speak for conservatives nor do conservatives give a shit what they have to say.
When, if ever, will SCOTUS reign in these judges and courts?
It is so sad to see this happening.
Damn judges to much Overeach Must end
Agree re activist judges, but what are the measurements of which judicial actions make the biggest difference. I don't disagree with you, but want some well-researched detail. Such detail is hard to find.
Any other specific critiques of Romney or Mauldin, or really good alternatives are welcome. BTW, they are both conservatives - which does not mean you have to like them personally or agree with them 100%. They both are knowledgeable, and Mauldin especially does his homework. Please take a step back, and post some detail or some entire new critiques.
Some people on this thread think I am arrogant, but a better description of me is that I am demanding and impatient. I like different opinions, provided there is some effort behind them.
So what is the problem with a singular judge issuing a stay or desist order on the executive branch? Besides it being stupid calling into question the legitimacy of that judge education and ability to pass the bar; what's the problem...? Laugh
The Democrats have been beating the drum of concern about the Law of the land and the Constitution for over 30 years. So where now is the concern that Muslims are calling for the jailing of Conservatives, refuse to reject Sharia Law that means they are rejecting the Law of the Nation, and are in general waving the middle finger at the good old USA just before Veterans Day?
Talked with a vote party line Dem and asked why knowing this did he continue understanding this a full attack on the Constitution and English based general laws. His answer was and is not to answer and look at the ground.
There you go. If you are a Dem, and have repudiated the proven press conferences where the DSA stated a clear Communist line what does that make you?
Nothing new here folks move along the Dem's lawfare judges are continuing what they were doing 30 years ago... They are now openly stating they want the USA torn down.